Just because the legislative session is over doesn’t mean Minnesota’s lawmakers get to go on vacation. CRPD Executive Director Brad Finstad talks with Jim about what legislators do in the off-season, from fairs and parades to preparing for the next session.
Rural MN Radio: More on the National Rural Assembly
This week on Rural MN Radio, Jim and Marnie continue their conversation about the 2013 National Rural Assembly in Bethesda, MD: speakers, including the Secretary of Health, the Secretary of Agriculture, a member of the White House Rural Council, and a visit to the Federal Communications Commission to talk about rural broadband.
Rural MN Radio: National Rural Assembly 2013
This week on Rural Minnesota Radio, Jim and Marnie talk about the National Rural Assembly, which took place in Bethesda, Md., last week. The event included panels, breakout sessions, and an admonition from the Secretary of Agriculture to rural America: “Be outraged.”
Watershed woes
This week on Rural Minnesota Radio, Jim talks with Dr. Shannon Fisher of Minnesota State University Mankato’s Water Resources Center. They discuss the problem of nitrates and other runoff found in the Minnesota River watershed.
Why aren’t we outraged?
At the National Rural Assembly in Bethesda, Maryland, this past Wednesday, I listened to U.S. Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack tell us that rural Americans should be outraged at the failure of Congress to pass a Farm Bill yet again. Instead, according to Secretary Vilsack, rural advocates only expressed “utter disappointed.”
Should we be outraged? That’s a good question. Rural people aren’t into outrage. We just don’t do outrage, at least not very well. Individually, yes. We can get ourselves worked up about a lot of things sitting in the coffee shop or standing around the coffee maker at the office. Some of us can even get pretty whipped up in public, at a city council or town council meeting. Although it’s usually only one person, maybe two, and the rest of us just cringe and wish they would sit down because their volume and anger is making us uncomfortable.
So maybe what we’re asking ourselves is, do we have a right to be outraged? Considering that 80% of the “Farm” Bill is actually nutrition programs, shared by both urban and rural America, and it is this part of the bill that is holding up the actual rural portions of the bill—for example, funds for assisting small businesses and funds used for grants to rebuild wastewater treatment infrastructure—maybe we do have a right. Maybe this is one more symptom of the breakdown in Washington, where in the past, the one bill that always did pass with little controversy was the Farm Bill. Maybe it is up to rural to tell Congress that America is fed up with the delays and excuses.
But what can we do? The rural population only makes up 16% of the total population (depending on which definition of rural you use). We don’t have the votes or the money to put pressure where it counts—do we? Well, the day before Secretary Vilsack’s visit, an analyst for the Center for Rural Strategies in Nebraska informed us that Mitt Romney lost last year’s presidential election because he didn’t campaign in rural areas. His campaign chose nine “strategic” states to concentrate on and basically skipped rural areas. An interesting thought. Could it be that finally rural can say “Ignore us at your peril”? Can we get together and say the same thing to Congress?
The raw milk debate
One genuine intersection of policy and public opinion can be seen in the raw milk debate. Here’s a clear collision between those who believe we need public policy to protect the greater good and those who think the government shouldn’t be telling them what they can and can’t eat.
